Submissions

Author Guidelines

Authors are invited to make a submission to this journal. All submissions will be assessed by an editor to determine whether they meet the aims and scope of this journal. Those considered to be a good fit will be sent for peer review before determining whether they will be accepted or rejected.

Before making a submission, authors are responsible for obtaining permission to publish any material included with the submission, such as photos, documents and datasets. All authors identified on the submission must consent to be identified as an author. Where appropriate, research should be approved by an appropriate ethics committee in accordance with the legal requirements of the study's country.

An editor may desk reject a submission if it does not meet minimum standards of quality. Before submitting, please ensure that the study design and research argument are structured and articulated properly. The title should be concise and the abstract should be able to stand on its own. This will increase the likelihood of reviewers agreeing to review the paper. When you're satisfied that your submission meets this standard, please follow the checklist below to prepare your submission.

Author Guidelines

All manuscripts submitted undergo a rigorous double-blind peer-review process to ensure academic integrity, quality, and relevance. Each submission is initially screened by the editorial team for scope, formatting, and originality. Suitable manuscripts are then reviewed anonymously by at least two independent experts in the relevant field. Reviewers assess the manuscript’s methodological soundness, scholarly contribution, clarity, and adherence to ethical standards. Based on the reviewers’ recommendations, the editorial board makes a final decision to accept, revise, or reject the submission. The entire review process typically takes 4 to 8 weeks.

1. Manuscript Preparation
   Manuscripts must be in Microsoft Word, double-spaced, with 12-point font and 1-inch margins. They should include the following sections: Title Page, Abstract, Research Highlights, Keywords, Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Recommendations, Acknowledgments, References, Tables, Figure Legends, and Figures.
2. Title Page
   Include the title, author names, affiliations, a short title (max 12 words), and contact details for the corresponding author.
3. Abstract
   A brief summary of the purpose, methodology, findings, and conclusions (max 300 words).
4. Keywords
   A maximum of 6 keywords.
5. Introduction
   Provide context, purpose, and background for the paper, linking relevant literature with the study’s objectives.
6. Literature Review
   Summarize key theoretical foundations and previous work on the subject, providing critical analysis.
7. Methodology
   Describe the study’s methods, including sampling and analysis techniques, and discuss ethical considerations.
8. Findings
   Present data clearly using tables, figures, and statistical tests.
9. Discussion
   Interpret the findings in relation to existing knowledge, and suggest areas for further research.
10. Recommendations
    Offer concise and actionable recommendations.
11. References
    Use APA style (version 20).
12. Tables and Figures
    Number consecutively and provide descriptive titles and legends.
13. Acknowledgments
    Mention any funding or assistance received.
14. Reviewers
    Suggest two potential reviewers not affiliated with UoK.
15. Article Classification
    Papers may be research papers, technical papers, case studies, or literature reviews.

Call for Papers.

The journal of Finance and Management Sciences is a bi-annual issue. We invite authors to submit papers for the upcoming issue, particularly those addressing sustainable development challenges. Submissions from diverse disciplines are encouraged, and we look forward to your contributions to this highly respected journal.

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement for the Journal of Financial and Management Sciences
The Journal of Financial and Management Sciences (JFMS) is committed to upholding the highest ethical standards in all aspects of the publication process. This statement outlines the ethical responsibilities of authors, editors, reviewers, and publishers to ensure integrity, transparency, and accountability in scholarly publishing.

Plagiarism Policy and Publication Ethics Statement

The Journal of Financial and Management Sciences (JFMS) is firmly committed to maintaining the highest standards of academic integrity and ethical conduct in scholarly publishing. Plagiarism, in all its forms, is considered a serious violation of publication ethics and is strictly prohibited.

Plagiarism includes, but is not limited to, the unacknowledged use of another person’s ideas, data, words, figures, or intellectual property; self-plagiarism or redundant publication without proper disclosure; inappropriate paraphrasing; and the submission of work that substantially overlaps with previously published or submitted material. All manuscripts submitted to JFMS must represent original work that has not been published elsewhere and is not under consideration by another journal.

JFMS employs plagiarism detection software to screen all submissions prior to peer review. Manuscripts found to contain unacceptable levels of textual similarity, improper citation, or misappropriation of intellectual content will be rejected outright. In cases where plagiarism is identified after publication, JFMS reserves the right to issue corrections, expressions of concern, or retractions in accordance with international best practices, including the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Authors bear full responsibility for ensuring the originality of their work and for appropriately citing all sources used. Proper attribution must be provided for all referenced ideas, data sets, methodologies, and previously published materials. Editors and reviewers are expected to remain vigilant and report any suspected cases of plagiarism or ethical misconduct encountered during the review process.

By submitting a manuscript to JFMS, authors acknowledge and agree to adhere to this plagiarism policy and affirm that their submission complies fully with accepted standards of ethical scholarly publishing.

1. Responsibilities of Authors

• Originality and Plagiarism: Authors must ensure that their work is original and has not been published elsewhere. Proper citations should be provided for all referenced work.
• Data Integrity: Authors must present accurate data and provide access to raw data if required for verification.
• Acknowledgment of Sources: All contributions of others must be properly acknowledged.
• Conflict of Interest: Authors should disclose any financial or personal conflicts of interest that
  may influence their work.
• Multiple Submissions: Manuscripts submitted to JFMS must not be under consideration or
  published elsewhere.

2. Responsibilities of Editors

• Editorial Independence: Editors will evaluate manuscripts solely on their academic merit without regard to race, gender, or political affiliations of the authors.
• Confidentiality: Editors must maintain the confidentiality of submitted manuscripts and will not disclose information to anyone outside the editorial process.
• Conflict of Interest: Editors must recuse themselves from handling manuscripts where conflicts of interest exist.
• Decision Making: Editors are responsible for making final decisions on publication, guided by the journal’s policies and ethical guidelines.

3. Responsibilities of Reviewers

• Confidentiality: Manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents.
• Objectivity: Reviews should be conducted objectively, with clear and constructive feedback.
• Acknowledgment of Sources: Reviewers should identify any relevant work not cited by the authors and report any ethical concerns, such as plagiarism.
• Timeliness: Reviewers should respond promptly and complete reviews within the agreed timeframe.

4. Responsibilities of the Publisher

• Publication Integrity: The publisher ensures that the journal operates transparently, upholding ethical standards and providing mechanisms for resolving disputes.
• Archiving: The publisher will maintain an accessible, permanent archive of all published articles.
• Corrections and Retractions: Mechanisms are in place to publish corrections or retractions when errors or misconduct are identified.

5. Ethical Oversight
The JFMS adheres to guidelines set forth by the Ethics Committee. The journal ensures the following:

• Mechanisms for addressing allegations of misconduct.
• Processes for ethical oversight of studies involving human or animal subjects.
• Policies to address complaints and appeals.

6. Reporting Ethical Concerns
Ethical breaches can be reported to the journal’s editorial office. Allegations will be handled promptly and transparently, adhering to COPE guidelines.

Use of Generative AI

The Journal of Financial and Management Sciences (JFMS) recognizes the growing use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Copilot, and similar technologies) in academic research and scholarly communication. This policy provides clear guidance on the ethical, transparent, and responsible use of generative AI by authors, reviewers, and editors involved in the publication process. This policy applies to all submissions to JFMS, including research articles, review papers, case studies, policy briefs, and editorial content.

Prohibited Uses of Generative AI

The following uses of generative AI are not permitted:

• Listing AI tools as authors or co-authors
• Generating original research data, results, or empirical findings
• Fabricating, falsifying, or manipulating data, citations, or references
• Producing entire manuscripts or substantial sections without meaningful human intellectual input
• Using AI to misrepresent authorship, originality, or methodological rigor

Any manuscript found to rely on AI-generated content in violation of these rules may be rejected or retracted.